Background: According to the performed research, different variables effects on the middle-aged women happiness but health status, financial distress, social support, self-esteem and positive thinking role have ignored as the perfect modeling.
Aims: This research has performed for studying type of happiness, health status, financial distress, social support, self-esteem and positive thinking role in middle-aged women whom live in Arak.
Methods: This research has been as the descriptive, correlation and structural equations. Statistical society included women whom are 36-55 years old and live in Arak in 2019. 408 persons were selected for performing research. All of them filed in the public health questionnaires (Goldberg and Hiller, 1979), financial distress (Provitz et al., 2006) social support (Zimet et al., 1988) self-esteem (Rosenberg, 1963) positive thinking (Ingram and Wisnicki, 1988) and Oxford happiness (Hills and Argil, 2002). Pearson correlation methods and structural equations modeling were used for data analysis.
Results: The results indicated that health variable (0.12, 0.15 and 0.18) financial distress (-0.18, -0.36 and -0.22) and social support (0.46, 0.55 and 0.43) has significant effects on self-esteem, positive thinking and happiness. In addition, that self-esteem and positive thinking variables has direct and significant effects on happiness. The results indicated that three variables, health variable (0.13) financial distress (-0.10) social support (0.12) has indirect and significant effect on self-esteem, positive thought and happiness on middle-aged women.
Conclusion: Thhis modeling is used for improving middle-aged women happiness and the principles of happiness, different types of social support, health status, financial distress, self-esteem and positive thinking and effective antecedents can be addressed in educational, social and communication media. A systematic review of previous research reveals that many factors explain self-injury behaviors in individuals. The measurement of self-injury and its relevant statements is of great importance; however, this aspect is disregarded in Persian research.

Background: Studies suggest that emotions are involved in initiating and maintaining adolescent self-injury behaviors. Although the research background refers to the positive effects of acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness therapy on adolescents' psychological problems, there is a research gap in the application of these two therapeutic approaches in the research community.
Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and mindfulness therapy on the emotional control of adolescents with self-injury behaviors.
Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental, with a pretest-posttest design and two months of follow-up. The statistical population of the study included all female students in public schools in District 1 of Tehran. 60 people were selected by stepwise cluster sampling method and randomly divided into two experimental groups and one control group. The first experimental group (ACT) and the second experimental group (mindfulness) had 8 sessions of therapeutic interventions. The first and second experimental groups each received 8 sessions of therapy based on acceptance and commitment and therapy mindfulness therapy. The research instrument included the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (Klonsky & Glenn, 2009) and the Emotion Control Scale (Williams et al., 1997). Data analysis was the multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using SPSS-23 software.
Results: In the post-test phase, both intervention methods had a significant effect on the improvement of the emotional control of adolescents with self-injury behaviors (P<0.01). In the follow-up phase, two interventions significantly improved emotional control, but there was no significant difference between the effectiveness of ACT and mindfulness therapy.
Conclusion: The research results showed that the ACT improved the emotional control of adolescents with self-injury behaviors by accepting emotions and preventing the avoidance of experience and the formation of committed action and healthy habits and by raising awareness of the present moment, improving the thought process, identifying and correcting negative cognitive beliefs, and providing appropriate cognitive responses.

Background: Despite the expansion of the use of treatment methods such as Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in clinical and research situations, few studies examine the exact effect of these methods and their co-influence on psychological variables, especially in the case of psychosomatic complaints.
Aims: The main purpose of this study is to compare the effect of acceptance and commitment therapy with dialectical behavior therapy on women's psychosomatic complaints during the Corona pandemic.
Methods: The present study was quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest design and a one-month follow-up with a control group. The statistical population of the study was all women aged 20-60 years old who had a file in two centers in Adiban and Khaneh Behi in 2021. In total, 45 patients were selected by the purposive sampling method through screening and entered the study. The selected patients were divided into three groups (every 15 samples were chosen randomly). Individuals in ACT and DBT each received 8 sessions of 90 minutes of treatment intervention online weekly, the control group did not receive any intervention. The research tool was the Psychosomatic Complaints questionnaire Takata and Sakata (2004). The data were analyzed using the mixed analysis of variance test.
Results: The findings showed that in the post-test phase, both intervention methods had a significant effect on reducing women's psychosomatic complaints (P<0.05). In the follow-up phase, two interventions significantly reduced women's psychosomatic complaints, but no statistically significant difference was observed between the two interventions (P>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the findings of the present study, it can be concluded that Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy are effective in reducing women's psychosomatic complaints. Therefore, awareness and application of these strategies can be effective in reducing women's psychosomatic complaints during the Corona era.