Write your message

Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Therapeutic Approach

Hossein Mohajeri, Farmarz Sohrabi, Enayatollah Zamanpour, Enayatollah Zamanpour,
Volume 24, Issue 147 (5-2025)
Abstract

Background: Just as different forms of dynamic psychotherapy can be considered as an effective tool for the treatment of mental disorders, it can also have negative effects. However, despite various studies, there have been few qualitative studies on the negative effects of dynamic psychotherapies.Aims: The purpose of this qualitative research was to present a conceptual model of the negative effects of dynamic psychotherapies based on the characteristics of the therapist, the client, and the theraputice approach. Methods: This research was conducted with a qualitative approach and Grounded Theory method. The study population of the research included all dynamic psychotherapists in Tehran and those clients 2023 and 2024 who had used dynamic psychotherapy. The research sample consisted of 18 dynamic psychotherapists and 8 clients who were selected by purposeful sampling method. The data collection tool in this research was semi-structured interviews. The data from the interviews were analyzed using the Strauss & Corbin method.Results: 17 axial codes including, primitive defense mechanisms of the client, quality of the parent-child relationship, client's personality traits, resistance to therapy, family structure disturbances, therapist's personality traits, therapist's professional errors, boundary violations, lack of professional competence, therapist's current life problems, non-objectivity of evaluation criteria in dynamic approaches, unstructured nature of dynamic therapies, exacerbation of symptoms, exacerbation of psychosomatic problems, intensification of self-destructive tendencies, and impairment of functioning, were identified as the components of the negative effects of dynamic psychotherapies, and finally, "interactive context of the therapist and client" was chosen as the central theme.Conclusion: it is suggested to evaluate the personality characteristics of therapists. It is also suggested that studies be conducted in order to investigate the interactive role of non-psychological treatments and dynamic therapies on the negative effects caused by psychotherapy

Ms Zahra Aboojasem, Dr Roshanak Khodabakhsh Pirkelani,
Volume 24, Issue 149 (7-2025)
Abstract


 Background: Social anxiety disorder, as one of the most common psychological disorders, is characterized by a persistent fear of negative evaluation in social and performance situations, significantly impacting the individual’s and social quality of life for those affected. Existing treatments include psychological interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy, particularly the widespread use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. However, the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of these methods, both individually and in combination, especially in diverse populations, remains limited and scattered.
Aims: The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of psychological interventions and pharmacotherapy on improving social anxiety through a systematic review.
Methods: This systematic review included research findings from 2016 to 2025, which were retrieved from databases such as SID, Springer, Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The search was conducted using English keywords: Psychological Interventions, Pharmacotherapy, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), Treatment Efficacy, Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), Combined Therapy (Psychotherapy + Medication), as well as their Persian equivalents: psychological interventions, pharmacotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, treatment efficacy, social anxiety disorder, combined therapy (psychotherapy + medication). Based on inclusion criteria, 38 out of 50 reviewed articles were selected, and the results were categorized, summarized, and reported.
Results: This systematic review indicates that Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is the first-line treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), leading to sustained improvement in symptoms and social functioning. Pharmacotherapy, particularly SSRIs, also reduces symptoms but is associated with side effects. Combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are more effective in severe cases, although psychotherapy alone yields comparable results. Personalizing treatment is essential to achieving optimal outcomes.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that both psychological treatments (especially CBT) and pharmacotherapy are effective in reducing social anxiety symptoms, with combined therapy yielding better results in severe cases. Novel interventions, such as virtual reality and mindfulness-based therapies, also show promising potential.
 



Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | Journal of Psychological Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)