Write your message
Volume 23, Issue 143 (12-2024)                   Journal of Psychological Science 2024, 23(143): 325-344 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohamadsadegh A, Asadpour E, Mohsenzadeh F, Rasouli M. (2024). The Efficacy of Premarital Program Attachment-Differentiation Premarital Model (ADPM) on Partner’s Perceived Responsiveness, Relationship Beliefs and Emotional Expression Among Premarried People. Journal of Psychological Science. 23(143), 325-344. doi:10.61186/jps.23.143.18
URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-2671-en.html
Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. , dr.iasadpour@khu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (100 Views)
Background: In recent years, premarital programs have been considered to strengthen marital life. Premarital education is a strategy to prevent marital dissatisfaction and the breakdown of marriages. One of the new premarital counseling models developed in 2020 is the Attachment-Differentiation Premarital Model (ADPM), which is considered an integrated, system-based approach to premarital counseling. ADPM is a 10-session program consisting of seven stages, each with significant tasks and expected outcomes. Numerous studies have demonstrated the impact of self-differentiation and attachment on perceived partner responsiveness, relationship beliefs, and emotional expressiveness. However, the combination of these two concepts in the context of premarital education has not been examined to date.
Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Attachment-Differentiation Pre-Marital Model (ADPM) on perceived partner responsiveness, relational beliefs, and emotional expressiveness among individuals on the verge of marriage.
Methods: This research employed a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group. The sample consisted of 20 individuals about to get married, who were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Participants received training in 10 sessions, each lasting 90 minutes. Data were collected using the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS), the Relationship Beliefs Inventory (RBI), and the Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire (EEQ). Data analysis was conducted using covariance analysis (ANCOVA) through SPSS software
Results: The results indicated a significant difference in the mean scores of perceived partner responsiveness, relational beliefs, and emotional expressiveness between the two groups. This finding suggests that the Attachment-Differentiation Pre-Marital Model is effective (P≤0.05).
Conclusion: Therefore, ADPM can be utilized as a pre-marital training approach for individuals seeking pre-marital counseling.
Full-Text [PDF 1488 kb]   (32 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/10/29 | Accepted: 2024/12/21 | Published: 2024/12/25

References
1. ادیب راد، نسترن، و ادیب راد، مجتبی. (1384). بررسی رابطه باورهای ارتباطی با دلزدگی زناشویی و مقایسه آن در زنان متفاضی طلاق و زنان خواهان ادامه زندگی مشترک. پژوهش های مشاوره (تازه ها و پژوهش های مشاوره)، 4(13)، 99-110. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/381634/fa
2. آزادی فرد، صدیقه و امانی، رزیتا. (1399). رابطه‌ی باورهای ارتباطی و سبک‌های حل تعارض با رضایت زناشویی. روانشناسی بالینی و شخصیت، 14(2)، 39-47.‎ 10.22070/14.2.39
3. امیدوار، ب.، فاتحی‌زاده، م.، و احمدی، ا. (1388). بررسی تأثیر آموزش پیش از ازدواج بر انتظارات زناشویی دانشجویان در آستانه ازدواج در شهر شیراز. خانواده‌پژوهی، 5(18)، 231-246. https://doi.org/10.52547/jfr.95401
4. ایمانی راد، اعظم؛ گل‌محمدیان، محسن؛ مرادی، امید؛ و گودرزی، محمود. (1400). اثربخشی زوج درمانی هیجان مدار بر بخشودگی و باورهای ارتباطی زوجین درگیر در پیمان‌شکنی زناشویی. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی علوم روانشناختی، 20(100)، 635-647.‎ 20.1001.1.17357462.1400.20.100.9.2
5. بلوچ زاده خورشانه، سعید؛ عبدی، منصور؛ غفاری، خلیل، و حمیدی پور، رحیم. (1400). مقایسه اثربخشی آموزش‌های قبل از ازدواج به روش برنامه آگاهی و انتخاب بین فردی و رویکرد چندبعدی بومی‌نگر بر اضطراب/اجتناب دلبستگی و تمایزیافتگی در افراد متقاضی ازدواج. مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، 64(1)، 415-426. 10.52547/rbs.19.3.415
6. جنیدی، الهام؛ نورانی سعدالدین، شهلا؛ مخبر، نغمه؛ و شاکری، محمدتقی. (1388). مقایسه خشنودی زناشویی در زنان بارور و نابارور مراجعه کننده به مراکز دولتی شهر مشهد (86-85). مجله زنان مامایی و نازایی ایران، 12(1)، 7-16. 10.22038/ijogi.2009.5898
7. رستمی، م.، نوابی‌نژاد، ش.، و فرزاد، و. (1398). آسیب‌شناسی مشکلات زوج‌ها در مرحله نامزدی: یک مطالعه کیفی. روانشناسی خانواده, 6(1), 55-68.. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijfp.6.1.55
8. رضازاده، م.، صدری دمیرچی، ا. (1399). اثربخشی آموزش پیش از ازدواج بر باورهای ارتباطی، خودکارآمدی و معناجویی در دانشجویان پرستاری. مشاوره و روان‌درمانی خانواده, 10(2), 165-196. https://doi.org/10.22034/fcp.2021.61958
9. شفیعی، رضوان؛ صالح زاده، مریم؛ دهقانی، فهیمه؛ و مرتضوی زاده، محمدرضا. (1398). نقش ابرازگری هیجانی و ترس از صمیمیت بر کیفیت روابط بین فردی بیماران مبتلا به سرطان. فصلنامه پژوهش در سلامت روانشناختی، 13(2)، 33-44.‎ 10.52547/rph.13.2.33
10. طباطبایی محمود، معماریان سپیده، غیاثی مهناز، عطاری عباس. سبک‌های ابراز هیجان و باورهای فراشناختی بیماران مبتلا به اختلال افسردگی اساسی. تحقیقات علوم رفتاری. ۱۳۹۲; ۱۱ (۵) :۳۴۲-۳۵۱. 20.1001.1.17352029.1392.11.5.3.2
11. قربان پورلفمجانی، امیر، دهقان، فاطمه، کریمی، فاطمه، و رضایی، سجاد. (1398). نقش سبک های دلبستگی, سبک های عشق ورزی و ابرازگری هیجان در پیش بینی شادکامی معلمان متاهل. پژوهشنامه روانشناسی مثبت، 5(4 (پیاپی 20) )، 15-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/386810/fa
12. کشاورز افشار، حسین؛ عابدینی، فاطمه؛ قهوه چی الحسینی، فهیمه؛ اسدی، مسعود؛ و جهان بخشی، زهرا. (1394). نقش ابرازگری هیجانی و عوامل جمعیت شناختی در پیش بینی رضایت زناشویی زنان. آسیب شناسی، مشاوره و غنی سازی خانواده، 1(1)، 59-66.‎ 20.1001.1.24234869.1394.1.1.5.4
13. لونی، سودابه و مالزاده، علیرضا. (1399). رابطه تابآوری و ابراز گری هیجانی با دلزدگی زناشویی در زنان مبتال به سرطان سینه. پنجمین همایش بین المللی افق‌های نوین در علوم تربیتی، روانشناسی و آسیب‌های اجتماعی، تهران، ایران. https://civilica.com/doc/1043724/
14. ملکی، مصطفی؛ محققی، حسین؛ نبی‌زاده، صفدر. (1398). پیش بینی گرایش به رفتارهای پرخطر براساس نشخوار خشم و ابرازگری هیجان. اندیشه و رفتار در روان شناسی بالینی، 14(52)، 7-16.‎ https://srb.sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1118144
15. Addis J, Bernard M. E. (2012). Marital adjustment and irrational beliefs. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 20 (1): 3-13. 10.1023/A:1015199803099
16. Birnbaum, G. E., & Reis, H. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212441028
17. Bowen, M. (1978). Family treatment in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.
18. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. I). Basic Books.
19. Bradbury, T. N., & Lavner, J. A. (2016). Premarital education and later relationship help-seeking. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(4), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12167
20. Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78*(6), 1053-1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053
21. Dagan, M., Sanderman, R., Hoff, C., Meijerink, W. J. H., Baas, P. C., van Haastert, M., & Hagedoorn, M. (2014). The interplay between partners’ responsiveness and patients’ need for emotional expression in couples coping with cancer. Journal of behavioral medicine, 37(5), 828-838.‌ 10.1007/s10865-013-9543-4
22. Debrot, A., Cook, W. L., Perrez, M., & Horn, A. B. (2012). Deeds matter: Daily enacted responsiveness and intimacy in couples' daily lives. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(4), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028666
23. Dell'Isola, R., Durtschi, J., Topham, G., & Gimarc, C. (2021). A new approach to marriage preparation: The Attachment-Differentiation Premarital Model. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 20(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2020.1829522
24. Doherty, W. J., Kalantar, S. M., & Tarsafi, M. (2021). Divorce ambivalence and reasons for divorce in Iran. Family Process, 60(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12539
25. Eidelson, R. J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 50(5), 715.‌ 10.1037//0022-006x.50.5.715
26. Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Krol, B., Sanderman, R., & Ruephan, M. (1987). The assessment of relationship beliefs in a marital context. Personality and Individual Differences, 8(6), 775-780.
27. English, T., Lee, I. A., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2017). Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals. Motivation and emotion, 41(2), 230-242.‌ 10.1007/s11031-016-9597-z
28. Fardis, M. (2017). Expression and Regulation of Emotions in Romantic Relationships. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/423
29. Filipović, S., Vukosavljević-Gvozden, T., & Opačić, G. (2016). Irrational beliefs, dysfunctional emotions, and marital adjustment: A structural model. Journal of Family Issues, 37(16), 2333–2350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15572384
30. Goddard, H. W., Olson, J. R., Galovan, A. M., Schramm, D. G., & Marshall, J. P. (2016). Qualities of Character That Predict Marital Well-Being. Family Relations, 65(3), 424–438. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44161264
31. Guerrero, L., K., Andersen, P. A., & Trost, P., R. (1998). Communication and emotion: Basic concepts and approaches. In Guerrero, L., K. & Andersen, P. A. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 3-27). San Diego: Academic Press.
32. Gündogdu, R., Yavuzer, Y., & Karatas, Z. (2018). Irrational Beliefs in Romantic Relationships as the Predictor of Aggression in Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3), 108-115.‌ 10.11114/jets.v6i3.2884
33. Handley, V. A., Bradshaw, S. D., Milstead, K. A., & Bean, R. A. (2018). Exploring similarity and stability of differentiation in relationships: A dyadic study of Bowen’s theory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45, 592–605. 10.1111/jmft.12370
34. Hawkins, A. J., Carroll, J. S., Doherty, W. J., & Willoughby, B. (2004). A Comprehensive Framework for Marriage Education. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 53(5), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00064.x
35. Kalantari, M., Bagheri, F., & Sadeghi, M. S. (2018). Effectiveness of educational program for enhancement of intimacy based on Iranian Native Culture on marital satisfaction of couples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.22034/apsy.2018.3284
36. Konishi, H., Froyen, L. C., Skibbe, L. E., & Bowles, R. P. (2018). Family context and children’s early literacy skills: The role of marriage quality and emotional expressiveness of mothers and fathers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.008
37. Lampis, J. (2016). Does partners’ differentiation of self predict dyadic adjustment? Journal of Family Therapy, 38(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12073
38. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. The Guilford Press.
39. Nakhaee, N., Eslami, M., Yazdanpanah, M., Andalib, P., Rahimi, A., Safizadeh, M., & Dadvar, A. (2020). Reasons for seeking a divorce in Iran. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(10-11), 2863-2870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520942226
40. Nickl, T. K. (2006). The relationship between irrational beliefs and marital satisfaction [dissertation]. Northen: Arizona. of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)), 27(1), 165–172. 10.32598/jpcp.10.3.779.1
41. Nilson, E. S. (2013). Expectations for marriage among college students from intact and nonintact homes. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 26(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijfp.7.1.147
42. O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Marital scales. In K. D. O'Leary & G. P. Vivían (Eds.), Assessment of marital discord: An integration for research and clinical practice (pp. 127-146). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315851396
43. Osafo, J., Oppong Asante, K., Ampomah, C. A., & Osei-Tutu, A. (2021). Factors contributing to divorce in Ghana: An exploratory analysis of evidence from court suits. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 62(4), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1871839
44. Rachmat, M., Setiawan, A., Wati, L., Lasmaria, L., & Hermanto, H. (2021). Is premarital guidance important to divorce prevention? Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 5189-5196. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.3284
45. Reis, H. T. (2014). Responsiveness: Affective interdependence in close relationships. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 255–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14250-015
46. Reis, H. T., Komashiro, M., & Ariyago, T. (2020). Perceived partner responsiveness to sexual talk: The role of individualistic and mutualistic sexual communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(2), 354-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519833002
47. Reis, H.T.; Clark, M.S.; Holmes, J.G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy; Mashek, D.J., Aron, A., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA,; pp. 201–225
48. Ruan, Yan & Reis, Harry & Clark, Margaret & Hirsch, Jennifer & Bink, Brian. (2019). Can I tell you how I feel? Perceived partner responsiveness encourages emotional expression. Emotion. 20. 10. 10.1037/emo0000650
49. Selcuk, E.; Gunaydin, G.; Ong, A.D.; Almeida, D.M. (2016). Does partner responsiveness predict hedonic and eudaimonic well-being? A 10-year longitudinal study. J. Marriage Fam, 78, 311–325. 10.1111/jomf.12272
50. Skowron, E. A., & Friedlander, M. L. (1998). The Differentiation of Self Inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.235
51. Stelzer K. (2010). Marriage education with Hispanic couples: Evaluation of A communication workshop. Family Science Review, 15(2): 1 -14. 10.26536/FSR.2010.15.02.01
52. Theiss, J. A., & Knobloch, L. K. (2014). Relational turbulence and the post-deployment transition: Self, partner, and relationship focused turbulence. Communication Research, 41(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211429285
53. Tumin, D., & Zheng, H. (2018). Do the health benefits of marriage depend on the likelihood of marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(3), 622-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12471
54. Vaillancourt-Morel, M. P., Rellini, A. H., Godbout, N., Sabourin, S., & Bergeron, S. (2019). Intimacy mediates the relation between maltreatment in childhood and sexual and relationship satisfaction in adulthood: A dyadic longitudinal analysis. Archives of sexual behavior, 48(3), 803-814.‌ 10.1007/s10508-018-1309-1
55. Von Culin, K. R., Hirsch, J. L., & Clark, M. S. (2018). Willingness to express emotion depends upon perceiving partner care. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 641-650.‌ 10.1080/02699931.2017.1331906
56. Wallerstein, J. (2019). The good marriage: How and why love lasts. Plunkett Lake Press.
57. Williamson, H. C., Hammett, J. F., Ross, J. M., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2018). Premarital education and later relationship help-seeking. Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 32(2), 276–281. 10.1037/fam0000383
58. Yedirir, S., & Hamarta, E. (2015). Emotional expression and spousal support as predictors of marital satisfaction: the case of Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 1549-155. 10.12738/estp.2015.6.2822
59. Zagefka, H., & Bahul, K. (2021). Beliefs that contribute to dissatisfaction in romantic relationships. The Family Journal, 29(2), 153-160.‌ https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720956638

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | Journal of Psychological Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)