Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 23, Issue 142 (12-2024)
Journal of Psychological Science 2024, 23(142): 117-133 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
mahdiyar A, moafi madani S K, kazempour E. (2024). Validation of organizational ecology management model in education. Journal of Psychological Science. 23(142), 117-133. doi:10.61186/jps.23.142.117
URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-2264-en.html
URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-2264-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran. , Moafimadani1983@gmail.com
Abstract: (615 Views)
Background: Today, environmental changes and organizations' reactions to these changes are one of the main problems in understanding the behavior of organizations, which requires a new management method. Therefore, in order to maintain the balance of internal needs and adapt to the environmental conditions, the education and training organization needs a management in which the causal, contextual, intervening conditions, consequences and organizational ecology management strategies are carefully examined. To help improve organizational behavior and interactions between organization members and the natural environment
Aims: The current research was conducted with the aim of validating the management model of organizational ecology in Tehran education.
Methods: The method of the current research was correlation with confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The research community included all the education managers of Tehran in 2023, of which 400 were selected using the available method. The measurement part of the paradigmatic model was done based on confirmatory factor analysis with AMOS software and the structural part of the model was done using structural equations based on partial least squares with PLS-3 software.
Results: The results showed that the research model has a good fit. In the paradigmatic model of organizational ecology management, causal conditions are based on phenomenon (P< 0.001,
β= 0.817), phenomenon-oriented on strategies (P< 0.001, β= 0.497), strategies on consequences
(P< 0.001), β= 0.361), intervening conditions have an effect on the results (P< 0.001, β= 0.284) and background factors have an effect on the results (P< 0.001, β= 0.337).
Conclusion: Organizational ecology management is a basic solution for the development of successful and flexible interactions of the employees of the education and training organization with each other and with the environment, and managers should, by knowing the effective components of organizational ecology management, take it into account in their planning. pay attention.
Aims: The current research was conducted with the aim of validating the management model of organizational ecology in Tehran education.
Methods: The method of the current research was correlation with confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The research community included all the education managers of Tehran in 2023, of which 400 were selected using the available method. The measurement part of the paradigmatic model was done based on confirmatory factor analysis with AMOS software and the structural part of the model was done using structural equations based on partial least squares with PLS-3 software.
Results: The results showed that the research model has a good fit. In the paradigmatic model of organizational ecology management, causal conditions are based on phenomenon (P< 0.001,
β= 0.817), phenomenon-oriented on strategies (P< 0.001, β= 0.497), strategies on consequences
(P< 0.001), β= 0.361), intervening conditions have an effect on the results (P< 0.001, β= 0.284) and background factors have an effect on the results (P< 0.001, β= 0.337).
Conclusion: Organizational ecology management is a basic solution for the development of successful and flexible interactions of the employees of the education and training organization with each other and with the environment, and managers should, by knowing the effective components of organizational ecology management, take it into account in their planning. pay attention.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2023/12/3 | Accepted: 2024/02/4 | Published: 2024/10/1
Received: 2023/12/3 | Accepted: 2024/02/4 | Published: 2024/10/1
References
1. Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). Attari R, Zakaryaei M. (2024). Analysis of educational managers' citizenship behaviors from the perspective of organizational psychology approaches: A narrative review. Journal of Psychological Science. 22(132), 2579-2597. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/JPS.22.132.2579
2. Azimi, H., Jafari, M., Fallahi, L. (2019). Investigating the impact of socio-cultural factors on organizational health with the mediating role of value-oriented. Management studies (improvement and transformation), 29 (95), 137-160. https://www.sid.ir/paper/964786/fa
3. Bida, O., Zorochkina, T., Oros, I., Kuchai, O., Chichuk, A., Kuchai, T. (2021). Forming ecological culture in educational applicants within the context of modern education. Amazonia Investiga, 3(2), 3-10. [DOI:10.34069/AI/2023.61.01.5]
4. Cera, E., Kusaku, A. (2020). Factors Influencing Organizational Performance: Work Environment, Training-Development, Management and Organizational Culture. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 6 (1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejes.v6i1.p16-27 [DOI:10.26417/ejes.v6i1.p16-27]
5. Downie, C. (2022). Competition, cooperation, and adaptation: The organizational ecology of international organizations in global energy governance. Review of International Studies, 48, 364-384. [DOI:10.1017/S0260210521000267]
6. Guo, W., Yang, J., Li, D., Lyu, C. (2020). Knowledge sharing and knowledge protection in strategic alliances: the effects of trust and formal contracts. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(11), 1366-1378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1769840 [DOI:10.1080/09537325.2020.1769840]
7. Hadijah, H.S. (2023). Implementation of Talent Management as a Strategy for Achieving Company Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6(1), 1-6. [DOI:10.29099/ijair.v6i1.379]
8. Haugh, H., Robson, P., Hagedoorn, J., Sugar K. (2022). The nascent ecology of social enterprise. Small Business Economics, 58, 1223-1242. [DOI:10.1007/s11187-020-00442-9]
9. Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 [DOI:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8]
10. Homan, H. (2014). Psychological and Educational Measurements. Seventeenth edition. Tehran: Paykefarhang Publications.
11. Leso, B.H., Cortimiglia, M.N., Ghezzi, A. (2023). The contribution of organizational culture, structure, and leadership factors in the digital transformation of SMEs: a mixed-methods approach. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25, 151-179. [DOI:10.1007/s10111-022-00714-2] [PMID] []
12. Lingens, B., Miehe, L., Gassmann, O. (2021). The ecosystem blueprint: How firms shape the design of an ecosystemaccording to the surrounding conditions. Long Range Planning, 54(2), 102043. [DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102043]
13. Liu, X., Yu, H., Lai, G., Wang, S., Xie, Y. (2022). Imitation or Innovation? Research on the Path of Enterprise Performance Improvement from the Perspective of Organizational Ecology. Sustainability, 14(12), 7223. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14127223 [DOI:10.3390/su14127223]
14. Long, B. (2022). Factors Affecting Organizational Performance: A Study on Four Factors: Motivation, Ability, Roles, and Organizational Support. Journal Of Social Sciences and Humanites, 2 (14), 28-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v1i4.147 [DOI:10.56943/jssh.v1i4.147]
15. Oliaie, M., Ajam, AA., Akbari, A., Fallah Mehne, T. (2024). Providing a smart leadership model in education. Journal of Psychological Science. 23(138), 1493-1508. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/JPS.23.138.1493
16. Osadchuk, V.V. (2022). Development of open education as a phenomenon of the XXI century. Adult education: theory, experience, perspectives, 1 (21), 58-67. [DOI:10.34069/AI/2023.70.10.9]
17. Radberg, K.K., Lofsten, H. (2023). Developing a knowledge ecosystem for large-scale research infrastructure. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(1), 441-467. [DOI:10.1007/s10961-022-09945-x]
18. Robertson, J., Caruana, A., Ferreira, C. (2023). Innovation performance: The effect of knowledgebased dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems. International Business Review, 32(2), 101866. [DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101866]
19. Sabokro, D., Hemati, M., Motadayen, H. (2022). A Comparison and Evaluation of the Basics of Relationship Between Human and Nature in Two Bodies of Landscape and Ecology Knowledge. Manzar, 14 (60), 37-30. [DOI:10.22034/manzar.2022.277940.2125]
20. Snell, S.A., Morris, S.S. (2021). Time for realignment: The HR ecosystem. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 219-236. [DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101866]
21. Tahmasbiroshan, N., Arab Kalmori, M., Alizadehsani, M., Jani Roshan, R. (2023). The impact of Sustainable Human Resources Management on Sustainable Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Supply Chain Management. Commercial Surveys, 20(116), 57-74. [DOI:10.22034/bs.2022.538702.2378]
22. Tran, H.T., Santarelli E. (2021). Successful transition to a market economy: an interpretation from organizational ecology theory and institutional theory. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(3), 652-677. [DOI:10.1093/icc/dtaa048]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)