Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 24, Issue 155 (12-2025)
Journal of Psychological Science 2025, 24(155): 23-33 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abdolpour G, Naeinian M, Manuela Peixoto M. (2025). Bridging the gap between sexual excitation/inhibition and female sexual function: The cognitive schema perspective. Journal of Psychological Science. 24(155), 23-33. doi:10.61186/jps.24.155.3
URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-3116-en.html
URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-3116-en.html
Department of Psychology, Humanities Faculty, Shahed University , mrnainian@yahoo.com
Abstract: (776 Views)
Background: Female sexual functioning is shaped by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and cognitive factors. While the Dual Control Model highlights the roles of sexual inhibition (SI) and sexual excitation (SE) in regulating sexual responses, little is known about the cognitive mechanisms underlying these processes.
Aims: This study investigates whether cognitive schemas activated in sexual contexts mediate the association between SI, SE, and female sexual function.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 665 adult women recruited from administrative departments of universities in Tehran and Tabriz. Participants completed the Sexual Excitation/Inhibition Inventory for Women (Graham, 2006), the Questionnaire of Cognitive Schemas Activated in Sexual Context (Nober, 2013), and the Female Sexual Function Index (Rosen, 2000). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesized mediation model.
Results: Findings indicated that both SI (β= −0.32, p< 0.001) and SE (β= 0.27, p< 0.001) had significant direct effects on female sexual function. Importantly, cognitive schemas partially mediated the relationship between SI and sexual function (indirect effect: β= −0.12, 95% CI [−0.18, −0.07]), suggesting that maladaptive cognitive patterns contribute to sexual difficulties. The overall model demonstrated good fit indices (χ²/df= 2.35, CFI= 0.95, RMSEA= 0.05).
Conclusion: This study supports the dual control model, with sexual inhibition and excitation affecting female sexual functioning, and cognitive model, with cognitive schemas influencing sexual functioning.
Aims: This study investigates whether cognitive schemas activated in sexual contexts mediate the association between SI, SE, and female sexual function.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 665 adult women recruited from administrative departments of universities in Tehran and Tabriz. Participants completed the Sexual Excitation/Inhibition Inventory for Women (Graham, 2006), the Questionnaire of Cognitive Schemas Activated in Sexual Context (Nober, 2013), and the Female Sexual Function Index (Rosen, 2000). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesized mediation model.
Results: Findings indicated that both SI (β= −0.32, p< 0.001) and SE (β= 0.27, p< 0.001) had significant direct effects on female sexual function. Importantly, cognitive schemas partially mediated the relationship between SI and sexual function (indirect effect: β= −0.12, 95% CI [−0.18, −0.07]), suggesting that maladaptive cognitive patterns contribute to sexual difficulties. The overall model demonstrated good fit indices (χ²/df= 2.35, CFI= 0.95, RMSEA= 0.05).
Conclusion: This study supports the dual control model, with sexual inhibition and excitation affecting female sexual functioning, and cognitive model, with cognitive schemas influencing sexual functioning.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2025/07/16 | Accepted: 2025/09/16 | Published: 2025/12/26
Received: 2025/07/16 | Accepted: 2025/09/16 | Published: 2025/12/26
References
1. Abdolpour, G., Azizi, M., Lashkari, A., Motahherirad, M., & Tayyari, E. (2023). Relationship between cognitive schemas activated in sexual context and marital satisfaction: A mediating role of body esteem. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches, 17(68), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.22034/JMPR.2023.15327
2. Alimoradi, Z., Zarabadipour, S., Arrato, N. A., Griffiths, M. D., Andersen, B. L., & Bahrami, N. (2022). The relationship between cognitive schemas activated in sexual context and early maladaptive schemas among married women of childbearing age. BMC psychology, 10(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00829-1
3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0033-2909.103.3.411
4. Azizi, M., Tayyari Dehbarez, E., Abdulpour, G., Nouri, M., Afshari, A., & Salari Pak, S. (2023). Investigate the Mediating Role of Coping Skills in the Relationship between Cognitive Schemas Activated in Sexual Context and Marital Satisfaction 25-36. Psychological Achievements. https://doi.org/10.22055/psy.2023.43600.3018
5. Bahrami, N., Peixoto, M. M., Griffiths, M. D., & Alimoradi, Z. (2021). Sexual Satisfaction and Cognitive Schemas Activated in a Sexual Context among Iranian Married Women of Reproductive Age. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1-12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0092623X.2021.1986185
6. Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2009). The dual control model: Current status and future directions. Journal of sex research, 46(2-3), 121-142. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490902747222
7. Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 54(2), 140-148. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.54.2.140
8. Bijttebier, P., Beck, I., Claes, L., & Vandereycken, W. (2009). Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality–psychopathology associations. Clinical psychology review, 29(5), 421-430. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272735809000476
9. Bolurian, Z., & Ganjloo, J. (2007). Sexual function disorder and the factors associated with this in women of reproductive age referring to Sabzevar health centers. J Fertilit Inferti, 86(2), 163-170. (In Persian) http://hrjbaq.ir/browse.php?a_id=250&sid=1&slc_lang=en
10. Brotto, L. A., Atallah, S., Carvalho, J., Gordon, E., Pascoal, P. M., Reda, M., ... & Tavares, I. M. (2025). Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction: recommendations from the fifth international consultation on sexual medicine (ICSM 2024). Sexual Medicine Reviews, 13(2), 118-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae073
11. Chou, C.-P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37–55). Sage Publications, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97753-003
12. Eskandar, K. (2025). Genetic contributions to the stability and satisfaction in Sexual Relationships. Global Medical Genetics, 12(2), 100043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02623-7
13. Fakhri, A., Morshedi, H., Soleymanian, A., & Hosaini, M. (2014). Psychometric Properties of Iranian Version of Male Sexual Function Index. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal, 12(6), 11-25. (In Persian) https://jsmj.ajums.ac.ir/index.php/index/index/article_49959.html?lang=en
14. Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2006). The sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women: Psychometric properties. Archives of sexual behavior, 35(4), 397-409. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-006-9041-7
15. İşık, C., Turhan, C., Turhan, C. (2025). The relationship between women’s cognitive flexibility and perceived partner responsiveness with sexual satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Current Psychology, 44(7), 6128-6138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07574-9
16. Janssen, E., & Bancroft, J. (2023). The dual control model of sexual response: A scoping review, 2009–2022. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(7), 948-968. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2219247
17. Jobim Fischer, V., Rossato Holz, M., Billieux, J., Andersson, G., & Vögele, C. (2024). Web-based emotion regulation training for sexual health: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Formative Research, 8, e50850. https://doi.org/10.2196/50850
18. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. https://www.guilford.com/books/Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rex-Kline/9781462523344
19. Kover, L., Szollosi, G. J., Frecska, E., Bugan, A., Berecz, R., & Egerhazi, A. (2024). The association between early maladaptive schemas and romantic relationship satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1460723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1460723
20. Kurpisz, J., Mak, M., Lew-Starowicz, M., Nowosielski, K., & Samochowiec, J. (2015). The Dual Control Model of sexual response by J. Bancroft and E. Janssen. Theoretical basis, research and practical issues. Postępy Psychiatrii i Neurologii, 24(3), 156-164. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1230281315000598
21. Milani, S., Dawson, S. J., & Velten, J. (2021). Visual attention and sexual function in women. Current Sexual Health Reports, 13(3), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-021-00312-9
22. Mojdeh, F., & Mohamadi, S. Z. (2013). The relationship between depression and sexual function index among married women. Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care, 21(1), 41-51. http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-1129&sid=1&slc_lang=en
23. Moreira, B. A. B. (2021). The role of sexual beliefs and sexual self-esteem in the adoption of sexually aggressive behaviors among college students. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.2015036
24. Nobre, P. (2013). Male sexual dysfunctions. The Wiley handbook of cognitive behavioral therapy, 645-672. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-01992-028
25. Nobre, P. J. (2009). Determinants of sexual desire problems in women: Testing a cognitive-emotional model. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 35(5), 360-377. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00926230903065716
26. Nobre, P. J. (2010). Psychological determinants of erectile dysfunction: Testing a cognitive–emotional model. The journal of sexual medicine, 7(4), 1429-1437. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S174360951532974X
27. Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2009). Cognitive schemas associated with negative sexual events: A comparison of men and women with and without sexual dysfunction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 842-851. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-008-9450-x
28. Oginni, O. A., alanko, K., Jern, P., Frühling Rijsdijk, V. (2023). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation: Moderation by childhood gender nonconformity and early-life adversity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 53(5), 1763-1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02761-w
29. Oliveira, C., & Nobre, P. J. (2013). The role of trait-affect, depression, and anxiety in women with sexual dysfunction: a pilot study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 39(5), 436-452. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0092623X.2012.665813
30. Peixoto, M. M., & Nobre, P. (2015). Cognitive schemas activated in sexual context: a comparative study with homosexual and heterosexual men and women, with and without sexual problems. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(3), 390-402. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10608-014-9661-5
31. Peixoto, M. M., & Nobre, P. J. (2020). Cognitive-emotional predictors of sexual functioning in lesbians, gays, and heterosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1823-1838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01732-9
32. Rettenberger, M., Klein, V., & Briken, P. (2016). The relationship between hypersexual behavior, sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, and personality traits. Archives of sexual behavior, 45(1), 219-233. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-014-0399-7
33. Rosen, C. Brown, J. Heiman, S. Leiblum, C. Meston, R. Shabsigh, D. Ferguson, R. D'Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 26(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597
34. Rosen, R. C., Taylor, J. F., Leiblum, S. R., & Bachmann, G. A. (1993). Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women: results of a survey study of 329 women in an outpatient gynecological clinic. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 19(3), 171-188. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00926239308404902
35. Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2024). Sexual excitation and inhibition in young women with different levels of sexual satisfaction. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090769
36. Sanders, S. A., Graham, C. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2008). Predicting sexual problems in women: The relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition. Archives of sexual behavior, 37(2), 241-251. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-007-9235-7
37. Schmidt, N. M., et al. (2024). Interplay between sexual excitation and inhibition: Impact on sexual function and neural correlates of erotic stimulus processing in women. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1386006
38. Sepehrian, F. (2012). Female sexual dysfunction and its related factors in Urmia. Studies in Medical Sciences, 23(2), 148-154. https://umj.umsu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=1325&sid=1&slc_lang=en
39. Stulhofer, A., & Brotto, L. A. (2023). Women’s sexual desire: New insights from biopsychosocial research. Nature Reviews Urology, 20(3), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-022-00770-0
40. Tavares, I. M., Moura, C. V., & Nobre, P. J. (2020). The role of cognitive processing factors in sexual function and dysfunction in women and men: a systematic review. Sexual medicine reviews, 8(3), 403-430. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2050052120300305
41. Velten, J., Scholten, S., Graham, C. A., & Margraf, J. (2017). Sexual excitation and sexual inhibition as predictors of sexual function in women: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(2), 95-109. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1115792
42. Wyatt, R. B. (2025). An Evaluation of the Effect of Sexual Schemas on Attentional Biases and Sexual Stimuli Interpretations for Men With Varying Degrees of Sexual Dysfunction: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Approach (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College).
43. Yahagh, M., Abdolpour, G., Lashkari, A., & Azizi, M. (2024). Structural Relationships of Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation with Female Sexual Function: The Mediating Role of Sexually Dysfunctional Beliefs. IJ Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-142626
44. Yeoh, S. H., Razali, R., Sidi, H., Razi, Z. R. M., Midin, M., Jaafar, N. R. N., & Das, S. (2014). The relationship between sexual functioning among couples undergoing infertility treatment: a pair of perfect gloves. Comprehensive psychiatry, 55, S1-S6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010440X12002192
45. Yousefi Afrashteh, M., Blouri, R., & Morovati, Z. (2024). Sexual anxiety mediate relationship between sexual schemas and body image with sexual function in Iranian women. Plos one, 19(7), e0305340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305340
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)