Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran. , alisadeghi@yu.ac.ir
Abstract: (72 Views)
Background: In architectural and urban planning research, selecting an appropriate research method is crucial, particularly in studies informed by cognitive sciences and environmental psychology. The choice of method directly influences the accuracy, reliability, and applicability of research findings.
Aims: This article aims to examine the significance of method selection in architectural and urban studies and to provide a framework for applying neuroscience-based approaches in future research.
Methods:This paper presents a methodological narrative review of studies that apply neuroscience‑based laboratory and simulation approaches to architectural research. The review covers publications between 2016 and 2024 identified through databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, following inclusion criteria focused on peer‑reviewed studies employing physiological or neuro‑cognitive measurements (EEG, fMRI, eye‑tracking, and VR simulations). A total of 59 papers were analyzed through a qualitative synthesis.
Results: The review indicates that laboratory- and simulation-based methods produce more realistic and reliable findings in assessing environmental factors affecting human perception and behavior. Current research demonstrates the growing application of neuroscience approaches in architectural and urban studies.
Conclusion: Selecting appropriate research methods, particularly laboratory- and simulation-based approaches, is essential for producing robust and applicable results in architecture and urban planning research. This study proposes a methodological framework to guide future research in this domain.
Aims: This article aims to examine the significance of method selection in architectural and urban studies and to provide a framework for applying neuroscience-based approaches in future research.
Methods:This paper presents a methodological narrative review of studies that apply neuroscience‑based laboratory and simulation approaches to architectural research. The review covers publications between 2016 and 2024 identified through databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, following inclusion criteria focused on peer‑reviewed studies employing physiological or neuro‑cognitive measurements (EEG, fMRI, eye‑tracking, and VR simulations). A total of 59 papers were analyzed through a qualitative synthesis.
Results: The review indicates that laboratory- and simulation-based methods produce more realistic and reliable findings in assessing environmental factors affecting human perception and behavior. Current research demonstrates the growing application of neuroscience approaches in architectural and urban studies.
Conclusion: Selecting appropriate research methods, particularly laboratory- and simulation-based approaches, is essential for producing robust and applicable results in architecture and urban planning research. This study proposes a methodological framework to guide future research in this domain.
Article number: 8
References
1. Abbas, S., Okdeh, N., Roufayel, R., Kovacic, H., Sabatier, J. M., Fajloun, Z., & Abi Khattar, Z. (2024). Neuroarchitecture: How the Perception of Our Surroundings Impacts the Brain. Biology, 13(4), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040220
2. Ancora, L. A., Blanco-Mora, D. A., Alves, I., Bonifácio, A., Morgado, P., & Miranda, B. (2022). Cities and neuroscience research: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 983352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.983352
3. Arbib, M. (2021). Verso le neuroscienze del processo progettuale. In La mente in architettura (Vol. 6, pp. 78-101). Firenze. DOI:10.36253/978-88-5518-286-7.06
4. Assem, a., & safwat, m. (2023). Computational design approach for applying neuro-architecture principles in healthcare facilities. Architecture and planning journal (apj), 28(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8547.1223
5. Banaei, M., Hatami, J., Yazdanfar, A., & Gramann, K. (2017). Walking through architectural spaces: The impact of interior forms on human brain dynamics. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11, 477. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00477
6. Charalambous, E. (2023). Neurourbanism and Neuroarchitecture: How can Cognitive Sciences Inform Design? (No. 6f4uc). Center for Open Science. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6f4uc
7. Cho, M. E., & Kim, M. J. (2017). Measurement of user emotion and experience in interaction with space. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.16.99
8. Djebbara, Z., Jensen, O. B., Parada, F. J., & Gramann, K. (2022). Neuroscience and architecture: Modulating behavior through sensorimotor responses to the built environment. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 138, 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104715
9. Eberhard, J. P. (Ed.). (2009). Brain landscape the coexistence of neuroscience and architecture. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/32846
10. Elborgy, R,. (2023). The human brain and a theoretical research about using the eeg in architecture, with a presenting of some study cases. International journal of advanced research, 11(05):271-286. doi: 10.21474/ijar01/16878
11. Erkan, İ. (2024). SEnSE OF uRBAn And ARchiTEcTuRAL EnViROnMEnT. Architecture and Engineering, 9(2), 33-46. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sense-of-urban-and-architectural-environment
12. Essa, I. A. (2000). Ubiquitous sensing for smart and aware environments. IEEE personal communications, 7(5), 47-49. DOI: 10.1109/98.878538
13. Jung, D., Kim, D. I., & Kim, N. (2023). Bringing nature into hospital architecture: Machine learning-based EEG analysis of the biophilia effect in virtual reality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 89, 102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102033
14. Khaleghimoghaddam, N., Bala, H. A., Özmen, G., & Öztürk, Ş. (2022). Neuroscience and architecture: What does the brain tell to an emotional experience of architecture via a functional MR study?. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(5), 877-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.02.007
15. Kim, E. H., Youn, C. S., Nam, Y. J., Hong, S., Cho, Y. H., Son, S. J., ... & Roh, H. W. (2023). Neuroarchitecture from the Perspective of Circadian Rhythm, Physical, and Mental Health. Chrono Med, 5, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.33069/cim.2023.0005
16. Kim, S., Ryu, J., Lee, Y., Park, H., & Lee, K. (2024). Methods for Selecting Design Alternatives through Integrated Analysis of Energy Performance of Buildings and the Physiological Responses of Occupants. Buildings, 14(1), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010237
17. Li, H., Du, X., Ma, H., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). The effect of virtual-reality-based restorative environments on creativity. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(19), 12083. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912083
18. Li, Y., & Du, H. (2024). Research on the restorative benefits of sky gardens in high-rise buildings based on wearable biosensors and subjective evaluations. Building and Environment, 111691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111691
19. Lucchini, M., & Bonenberg, A. (2022). A common ground between neurosciences and architectural design: empathy, embodiment, emotion. Przestrzeń i Forma, (50). https://re.public.polimi.it/handle/11311/1218508
20. Mallgrave, H. F. (2010). The architect's brain: Neuroscience, creativity, and architecture. John Wiley & Sons. https://philpapers.org/rec/MALTAB
21. Mahdi Nejad, J. E. D., Azemati, H. R., & Sadeghi habibbad, A. (2019). Ranking of spiritual tranquility indicators in traditional Mosque architecture based on perception of" sense of spirituality" using" vikor" method. Journal of Ontological Researches, 7(14), 59-82. https://orj.sru.ac.ir/article_1007_en.html?lang=en
22. Mavros, P., J Wälti, M., Nazemi, M., Ong, C. H., & Hölscher, C. (2022). A mobile EEG study on the psychophysiological effects of walking and crowding in indoor and outdoor urban environments. Scientific reports, 12(1), 18476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20649-y
23. Mostafavi, A., Cruz-Garza, J. G., & Kalantari, S. (2023). Enhancing lighting design through the investigation of illuminance and correlated color Temperature's effects on brain activity: An EEG-VR approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 75, 106776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106776
24. Ndaguba, E., Cilliers, J., Mbanga, S., Brown, K., & Ghosh, S. (2022). Re-imaging the future in urban studies and built environment discourse: A Neurourbanism perspective. Buildings, 12(12), 2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122056
25. Papale, P., Chiesi, L., Rampinini, A. C., Pietrini, P., & Ricciardi, E. (2016). When neuroscience ‘touches’ architecture: From hapticity to a supramodal functioning of the human brain. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 866. https://flore.unifi.it/handle/2158/1056909
26. Payedar-Ardakani, P., Gorji-Mahlabani, Y., Ghanbaran, A. H., & Ebrahimpour, R. (2024). The impact of changes in daylight illuminance levels on architectural experiences in office environments using virtual reality and electroencephalogram. Journal of Building Engineering, 96, 110487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110487
27. Rad, P. N., Behzadi, F., Yazdanfar, S. A., Ghamari, H., Zabeh, E., & Lashgari, R. (2023). Exploring methodological approaches of experimental studies in the field of neuroarchitecture: A systematic review. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16(2), 284-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867221133135
28. Robinson, S. (2015). Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design; Robinson, S., Pallasmaa, J., Eds. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f65/8996ea853fc522fe4e6d248a3942813acc17.pdf
29. Şekerci, Y. (2024). Neuroscience and Spatial Design Bibliometric Analysis in Web of Science Database. Journal of Computational Design, 5(2), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.53710/jcode.1519629
30. Shaer, O., & Hornecker, E. (2010). Tangible user interfaces: past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 3(1–2), 4-137. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000026
31. Sadeghi habibabad, A., MahdiNejad, J. E. D., Azemati, H., & Matracchi, P. (2021). Examination of the psychological impact and brainwaves functioning of the users of buildings and environments built based on promoting relaxation and spiritual sense. Journal of spirituality in mental health, 23(4), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2020.1738311
32. Vecchiato, G., Tieri, G., Jelic, A., De Matteis, F., Maglione, A. G., & Babiloni, F. (2015). Electroencephalographic correlates of sensorimotor integration and embodiment during the appreciation of virtual architectural environments. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01944
33. Wang, H., Hou, K., Kong, Z., Guan, X., Hu, S., Lu, M., ... & Qian, Y. (2022). “In-Between Area” Design Method: An Optimization Design Method for Indoor Public Spaces for Elderly Facilities Evaluated by STAI, HRV and EEG. Buildings, 12(8), 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081274
34. Zhang, N., Liu, C., Hou, C., Wang, Z., He, X., & Gao, W. (2024). The application in electroencephalogram technology for investigating indoor lighting environments: a review. Journal of Building Engineering, 110020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110020
35. Zhang, N., Liu, C., Zhang, M., Guan, Y., Wang, W., Liu, Z., & Gao, W. (2025). Effects of traffic noise on the psychophysiological responses of college students: An EEG study. Building and Environment, 267, 112171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112171
36. Zhang, Y. O., Tang, Y., Wang, X., & Tan, Y. (2024). The Effects of Natural Window Views in Classrooms on College Students’ Mood and Learning Efficiency. Buildings, 14(6), 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061557
37. Zomorshidi, H., & Sadeghi, habibabad. A. (2018). Brick and art of brickwork since ancient times to now., Journal of Studies On Iranian - Islamic City, 33, 5-18. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1949571
38. Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Li, J., Jing, X., Shi, J., & Gao, W. (2024). The effect of classroom size and ceiling height on college students’ learning performance using virtual reality technology. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 15341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65754-2
39. Zhao, m., ding, c., & crossley, t. (2023). Integration of eeg and deep learning on design decision-making. human-centric, proceedings of the 28th international conference of the association for computer-aided architectural design research in asia (caadria), volume 1, 89-98. https://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/caadria2023_161.pdf
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)